Aruna Talent vs Bunny Agency.

Any number can be written on a website. Any testimonial can be curated. Any screenshot can be cropped. The only evidence that cannot be fabricated, staged, or selectively presented is a live earnings dashboard opened in real time during a call, before any commitment is made. It shows what current creators actually earn. The timestamp is live. There is no mechanism for an agency to pre-select the data.

Bunny Agency's public site does not document live dashboard access for prospective creators before commitment. Claims an agency publishes rest on evidence it controls and chose to publish, and they tell you nothing about the median performer, the creator who left, or the gap between best-case marketing and actual operational output.

Aruna Talent opens the live earnings dashboard on every discovery call. You pick a creator on the roster and watch her live earnings, her identity hidden. The full picture, before any conversation about signing begins. That is not a feature. It is the only honest standard of evidence in this industry.

A single identity exposure can end a career, damage personal relationships, and create professional consequences that compound over time and cannot be reversed. The privacy infrastructure an agency uses is not an optional feature for creators where anonymity matters. It is the precondition for everything else working safely.

Bunny Agency does not publicly document a specific identity protection infrastructure, a verifiable zero-leak record across a disclosed creator base and time period, fake name protocols, DMCA monitoring coverage, or geo-blocking capabilities. Without that documentation, a prospective creator has no objective basis on which to evaluate actual privacy risk before signing. A general reference to discretion is not an operational system, and it is not the same as a documented record of zero leaks.

Aruna Talent's privacy record is documented: zero identity exposures across 60+ creators over 4+ years. The infrastructure behind that record is specific: fake name systems, NDA-enforced team access, geo-blocking on request, and DMCA monitoring across 500+ sites with takedowns executed within hours. This is an operational record any prospective creator can ask about directly on a discovery call.

Commission structures in OnlyFans management are not regulated, vary significantly across agencies, and are not always consistent between what is communicated verbally and what appears in a signed contract. Bunny Agency does not transparently publish their commission structure or full fee breakdown prior to engagement.

Before signing with any agency, the complete fee structure (commission percentage, revenue base, every included service, and any additional costs) should be confirmed in writing before any content is created or any profiles are built. A verbal pitch that differs from the signed contract is not a mistake. It is a liability a creator has already accepted.

Aruna Talent's full fee structure is disclosed before any commitment: no retainers, no per-service fees, no exit costs. DM management, content strategy, social media, DMCA monitoring, and identity protection are all included, listed explicitly on the first call and written into the agreement.

Agencies differ significantly in what they actually manage. Some handle content but not social media. Some offer DMCA but not identity protection. Some manage DMs but not chatting at scale. The gaps matter because a creator whose agency handles some operations but not others is still responsible for filling them: with their own time, their own money, or both.

Bunny Agency's service scope is not fully documented publicly with the granularity a prospective creator needs to evaluate total coverage.

Aruna Talent's operational scope is explicit: DM management, content strategy, social media build-out across TikTok, Instagram, Reddit, and Twitter/X, DMCA monitoring across 500+ sites, identity protection including fake name systems and geo-blocking on request, all included in the standard commission. No operational gaps for a creator to self-manage. That is full-service management, not selective coverage.